Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022 - Calcutta High Court – Falsely Implicated allegations made against the parents-in-law. FIR Quashed.

 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022 - Calcutta High Court – Falsely Implicated allegations made against the parents-in-law. FIR Quashed.

 

498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022 - Calcutta High Court – Falsely Implicated allegations made against the parents-in-law. FIR Quashed.
498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

GET THIS DOC IN PDF WITH CASE DETAILS

Sri Sudhir Chandra Mondal & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 8.07.2022

498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022 – In this article, the Calcutta High Court has held that the FIR filed in this case has been filed against the parents-in-law as the allegations made against them are false and they are dragged in the criminal proceedings with a wrong intention. The petitioners were dragged in the criminal proceedings as Falsely implicated allegations were made against them without quoting any specific incident which would attract the provisions of section 498A IPC. And hence, the FIR against the petitioners was quashed.

 

Case brief - 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

The marriage between the husband and the wife took place on 18.02.2011 and was solemnized as per the rites and customs of their religion. In the initial years of the marriage, everything was going on fine between the couple.

After the marriage, the father-in-law regularly insisted the husband of the defacto complainant not maintain any sort of conjugal relationship with his wife.

Whenever the wife came to her in-law’s home with her husband, her father-in-law used to assault her mentally continuously.

When her husband used to come to his home without his wife, he was repeatedly provoked against the wife and compelled not to keep any contact with the wife.

When the wife called her in-laws over the telephone with a request to allow her to talk to her husband, then her in-laws used to give her slang and humiliate her.

Being the only daughter of her parents there was a mutual understanding prior to her marriage with the wife that she will stay at Madhyamgram to look after her father who is a cancer patient and her mother who is a patient with asthma and arthritis.

In spite of such understanding, the petitioners forcibly insisted her stay at Kapgari Jambani, though she was not at all agreeable to this and as a result, her husband was strongly pressurized to give her divorce.

Petitioners in the present case being the parents-in-law used to instigate their son i.e.; the husband to break up the matrimonial relationship with the wife.

On 10.02.2016 when the wife along with her husband came to her in-law's home, to see her father-in-law attempted to assault her physically with a ferocious attitude and her husband rescued her from the place, otherwise, her life would have been at a stake.

On 10.02.2016 the mother-in-law threatened her husband over the telephone not to come to their home in the future as the said house is her husband's house.

And as a result, a written complaint on 11.02.2016 to that effect was lodged by the wife.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A Summons quashing 09.05.2022 - Allahabad High court - Magistrate passed order without applying judicious mind. Summons Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement by Bombay High court- General and over-implicated allegations against the husband and the entire family. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 28.03.2022 - Karnataka High court - General and Omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.

BUY "498A QUASH" - EBOOK - A GUIDE TO 498A QUASH

__________________________________________________________________________

Arguments - 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

The advocate appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in no way connected with the alleged offence and on the date of the alleged incident father-in-law was hospitalized.

Moreover, ingredients of Section 498A IPC are completely absent in the present case and statements made under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the witnesses do not support the prosecution case.


He further submitted that if the entire allegations in the complaint are taken to be true then also it does not disclose any offence against the present petitioners.

On the other hand, the advocate appearing for the state submitted that the evidence is going on before the trial court and whether the materials collected during the investigation constitute any offence or not will be decided at the trial and as the trial is continuing it would not be proper to quash the proceeding invoking section 482 of the code.

 _______________________________________________________________________________


__________________________________

Referred cases - 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

1. Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others v State of Bihar and Others

2. Neelu Chopra andanother v. Bharti

3. Preeti Gupta v.State of Jharkhand

4. Geeta Mehrotrav. State of Uttar Pradesh

 ________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________ 

Court opinion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

Now from the facts and circumstances of the case, it is quite clear that in the FIR and also in the statements recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C., no specific allegation has been attributed against the present petitioners which can disclose any offence.

All besides the casual reference to inflicting mental torture and casual reference of some irrelevant matrimonial discord with the family members, with whom she did not admittedly reside.

Without evaluating the specific role played by petitioners for constituting the alleged offence, the Magistrate was not justified in taking cognizance over an issue that might have occurred due to family dispute.

The wife has roped two aged persons with allegations were ingredients of offence alleged are absent. Practically there is no mention either in the complaint or in the statements as to how the mental cruelty was inflicted and what specific role has been played by each of the petitioners in committing the alleged offense.

Accordingly, the court is of the view that the impugned prosecution is wholly unfounded and therefore to secure the ends of justice and for preventing the abuse of the process of the criminal court, the impugned proceeding, arising out of Jamboni Police station dated 11.02.2016 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code now pending before the Magistrate is hereby quashed.

_____________________________________________________

Buy "Guide to Fight Maintenance Under section 125 Cr.P.C

Conclusion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 08.07.2022

In this article, the Calcutta High Court has held that the allegations made against the petitioner i.e.; parents-in-law were falsely implicated in nature. The petitioner was dragged into the criminal proceeding with the wrong intention.

The allegations don’t attract the provisions of Section 498A IPC. Therefore, the Calcutta High court has quashed the FIR filed against the petitioners.


Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Right
WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment