Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021 – Allegations made against the husband, father-in-law, & mother-in-law are false & general in nature. FIR Quashed.

 498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021 – Allegations made against the husband, father-in-law, & mother-in-law are false & general in nature. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021 – Allegations made against the husband, father-in-law, & mother-in-law are false & general in nature. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021


498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021 – In this article, the High court held that the allegations made against the husband, Father-in-law, & Mother-in-law were false and were made with an ulterior motive of revenge and therefore the complaint cannot be allowed to continue and the prosecution of these petitioners is nothing but a clear abuse of process of law. Hence, the FIR was quashed by the high court.

Case Brief - 498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021

The marriage of husband & wife was solemnized according to their customs. Post the marriage, the husband along with her wife were residing in England for a period of three years i.e.; from the year 2012-2015. A re-marriage was conducted on 25.01.2015 when they came back to India in the presence of the witnesses.

It is stated by the wife that the family members of the Husband have caused cruelty over the phone, but there were no specific detailed allegations against the petitioners.

______________________________________________________

BUY "498A QUASH" - EBOOK - A GUIDE TO 498A QUASH

____________________________________________________________________________

Arguments of Parties - 498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021

Advocate of the petitioners contended that FIR has been lodged against all the family members of the husband including the sister-in-law & brother-in-law though their names were later dropped from the FIR.

Further, it is contended that the complaint is nothing but a clear abuse of the process of law and the husband with his wife have never lived in India throughout their matrimonial life. They have all along lived in the UK till their separation.

It is contended that all the allegations were framed by the father of the wife, who was a retired Police officer in the rank of DIG. Also, it is further stated that similar allegations were made in the petition filed before the UK court for domestic violence which was dismissed by the UK court within a month, thereafter present complaint has been filed in India & unnecessarily all the petitioners have been roped in.

______________________________________________________

Contact For Counseling to discuss Your case For Right Solutions

______________________________________________________________________________


Court Opinion - 498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021

The court is satisfied that the complaint has been filed with ulterior motive and false allegations have been made in order to take revenge such a complaint cannot proceed further and the prosecution of these petitioners is clearly an abuse of the process of law.

The court is of the view that the allegations are false and are general in nature. This clearly shows that these allegations were made out of matrimonial issues. Such allegations are highly improbable and the same shows that such condition has been pressed into service only for jurisdictional purposes.

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________


Conclusion - 498A Quash Judgement 10.11.2021

In this article, the high court held that the allegations against the father-in-law & mother-in-law who have been residing separately throughout the matrimonial life of the husband & wife are general and false in nature. Hence, the High court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR. 


Follow us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram

Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Right
WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment