Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – Omnibus statements made against Parents-in-law & Sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – Omnibus statements made against Parents-in-law & Sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.


498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – Omnibus statements made against Parents-in-law & Sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.
 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

GET THIS DOC IN PDF WITH CASE DETAILS


Sri Akhani Athaulla vs State Of Karnataka on 29.06.2022

498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022 – In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the FIR filed in this case has been filed against the parents-in-law & the sister-in-law as the allegations made against them are false and they are dragged in the criminal proceedings with a wrong intention. It is clear that all the petitioners never got a chance to reside with the wife at her matrimonial home. After reading the FIR and the chargesheet it is clear that majorly the allegations were against the husband. The petitioners were dragged in the criminal proceedings as Omnibus allegations were made against them without quoting any specific incident which would attract the provisions of section 498A IPC. And hence, the FIR against the petitioners were quashed.

 

Case brief - 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

The marriage between the husband and the wife took place on 14.01.2018 and was solemnized as per the rites and customs of their religion. Initially, everything was running smoothly between the couple.

Eventually, the relationship between the two appeared to have turned sore and on that score, the wife registered a complaint on 12.12.2020 alleging torture for dowry demand by the petitioners i.e.; parents-in-law & sister-in-law.

The police after the investigation had filed a chargesheet against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 114, 323, 307, 504, and 34 of IPC and Sections 3, 4, & 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

On the filing of the chargesheet, the petitioners are standing here before this court in the subject petition. Further, the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners have been interjected by an interim order which is granted by this Court.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash after chargesheet 06.06.2022 -  Karnataka High court - General and Omnibus allegations made against the brother-in-law, his wife & sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

__________________________________________________________________________ 


Arguments - 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

The advocate appearing for the petitioners submitted that there are no allegations made against the petitioners, who are father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law, who did not reside with the wife at any point in time and were without any reason dragged into these criminal proceedings. The advocate would clarify that Section 307 of IPC is alleged against the husband, as there are instances of such torture, which would become offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC against the husband.

On the other hand, the advocate appearing for the wife would seek to justify the action of registration of the chargesheet against the petitioners and would submit that it is a matter of trial to continue so the petitioners have to come out clean.

Prosecutor would toe the lines of the advocate appearing for the wife.

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________   

 

Referred cases - 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

1. Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others v State of Bihar and Others

2. Rajesh Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh

3. Arnesh Kumar v.State of Bihar

4. Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand

5. Geeta Mehrotrav. State of Uttar Pradesh

6. G.V. Rao v. L.H.V. Prasad

7. K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana 

________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

Court opinion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

The above-mentioned narration is the allegation against the petitioners, except making omnibus statements that the petitioners have instigated the husband to behave in the manner that he has behaved, which is without any doubt reprehensible, as there are no statements that would touch the offences under the IPC. As far as the offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 is concerned, the complaint narrates that the petitioners belong to a well-to-do family and have lots of money.

Therefore, the probability of the allegations being made for dowry demand wouldn’t hold water against the petitioners.

The police after investigation filed the chargesheet. All the allegations in the charge sheet also point at instances of torture by the husband and instigation by the petitioners herein. Finding nothing that would touch upon the offences punishable under Section 498A or 323 or 307 of IPC against the petitioners. The court deems it appropriate to terminate the proceedings qua the petitioners.

Considering the undisputed facts and the judgment of the Apex Court, if further proceedings would continue, it would result in a miscarriage of justice.

 _________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022

In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the petitioner i.e.; parents-in-law & the sister-in-law were omnibus in nature. As it is clear that the petitioners never got a chance to reside with the couple in her matrimonial home. The petitioner was dragged into the criminal proceeding.

The allegations don’t attract the provisions of Section 498A IPC. By reading the FIR it is clear that majorly the allegations were made against the husband.

Therefore, the Karnataka High court has quashed the FIR filed against the petitioners.



Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Right 

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment