Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

Home 498aJudgments 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Omnibus allegations made against the sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

498A quash judgement 23.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Omnibus allegations made against the sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Omnibus allegations made against the sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

498A quash judgement 23.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Omnibus allegations made against the sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.
498A quash judgement 23.03.2022

Read More Judgements on 498a Quash

Smt. Shilpa vs State By Magadi Road Police on 23.03.2022

498A quash judgement 23.03.2022 – In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the sister-in-law are general and omnibus in nature. As it is clear from reading the complaint that majorly the allegations are made against the husband and the parents-in-law. But the allegations against the petitioner is made without quoting any specific incident which would attract the provisions of section 498A IPC. And the petitioner is dragged in the criminal proceedings just to take vengeance. Therefore, the Karnataka High Court has quashed the petition against all the petitioners.


Case Brief – 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022

Prior to the marriage of the wife with the husband, the husband along with his parents and the petitioners i.e.; the sister-in-law of the wife had come to the wife’s home and raised a demand of 300 grams of gold and Rs.3 lakhs cash, as dowry and wife’s father agreed to give Rs.2 lakhs of gold.

Accordingly, the couple got engaged on 07.02.2014. And the wife got married to the husband on 08.03.2015 as per the rules and customs of their religion. After the marriage, the wife started to reside at her matrimonial home along with the parents-in-law.

There the husband, the parents-in-law, and the sister-in-law started to harass the wife physically and mentally by demanding additional dowry. The wife further stated that the parents-in-law and the sister-in-law did not allow the husband, to stay with her until she pays Rs.50 lakhs as dowry.

Again on 17.05.2015, all these family members demanded Rs.15 lakhs and that’s when the wife came to her parent’s home and informed them about this. Again on 23.05.2015 the family members came to the wife’s home and informed her that the wife requires counseling as she is suffering from a psychiatric problem and returned without taking the wife back to the matrimonial home.

Later the wife along with her mother went to her matrimonial home, but they didn’t even allow her to enter the home and throw her out of the home, and even tried to squeeze her neck.

Therefore, the panchayath was also held on 07.05.2015 and 09.06.2015 but the family members did not mend his way. Thereafter in the month of Ashada, her parents brought her back to the matrimonial home, and thereafter the parents-in-law came and threw her out of the home.

The wife lodged a complaint, for the same registered by Magadi Road Police Station, Bengaluru, on 25.06.2015.

_________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

Arguments – 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022

The advocate for the petitioner contended that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner except an omnibus statement made against the petitioner as she resides in Kerala.

The petitioner is residing with her husband and son in Kerala and recently her husband went abroad the petitioner is also preparing to go abroad along with her husband. The wife has falsely included the petitioner's name which amounts to abuse of the process of law. In support of his contentions, the advocate relied on the landmark judgment of Supreme court Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others v State of Bihar and Others.

On the other hand, the other advocate objected that there is averments made in the complaint that the petitioner and other family members joined the mother-in-law and harassed the wife and there is sufficient material placed on record to frame the charges.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 16.03.2022 - Bombay High court - General and absurd allegations made against the brother-in-law and his wife. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 11.03.2022 - Madhya Pradesh High court - Falsely implicated Omnibus allegations against entire family of the husband. FIR Quashed.


________________________________________________________________________


Court Opinion - 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022

On reading the statements of the complainant of course there are specific allegations made against the husband and the parents-in-law. However, in the entire complaint, only the name of the petitioner is added as sister-in-law stating her an accused.

Specifically, there are no averments against the petitioner for having committed any harassment for the wife individually or abating the other accused to commit any such offence, the allegation against the other accused attracts the offence under Section 498A and 323 of abusing her in filthy language and harassment.

There are no specific averments against the petitioner. The allegation made against this petitioner does not fall under any offences.

Admittedly, the entire statement of the wife is against the husband and her parents-in-law and omnibus statement stating that the present petitioner is also present and committed offence along with other accused.

Therefore, it isn’t acceptable that the petitioner also harassed the complainant physically and mentally and demanded dowry or additional dowry. Hence, conducting a trial against the petitioner will be an abuse of the process of law. Hence the proceedings are liable to be quashed.

_________________________________________________________________________________


Conclusion - 498A quash judgement 23.03.2022

In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that general and omnibus allegations are made against the petitioner i.e.; sister-in-law without quoting any specific allegations. It is clear from reading the complaint that majorly the allegations are made against the husband and the sister-in-law. The allegations made against the sister-in-law were made just to make her suffer through the criminal proceedings.

In view of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, in the absence of any specific allegations made against the petitioner, the Karnataka High court has quashed the petition against all the petitioner.

________________________________________________________________________

Contact For Counseling to discuss Your case For Right Solutions_______________________________________________________________________





Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Rights
WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment