Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

Home 498aJudgments 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – General and omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.

498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – General and omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.

 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – General and omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.

498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – General and omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.
 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022

GET THIS DOC IN PDF WITH CASE DETAILS


Shrishail Laxman Belagali vs State Of Karnataka on 17 March, 2022

498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022 – In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the relatives of the husband are general and omnibus in nature. As it is clear from reading the complaint that there are some allegations made against the husband. But allegations against the other petitioners are made without quoting any specific incident which would attract the provisions of section 498A IPC. And the petitioners are dragged in the criminal proceedings just to take vengeance. Therefore, the Karnataka High Court has quashed the petition against all the petitioners.


Case Brief – 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022

The marriage of the wife was solemnized with the husband on 25.05.2014. It is alleged that after the marriage the husband refused to take his wife back to her matrimonial home in Bangalore, in spite of several requests made by the wife to that effect with the husband.

It is further alleged that the wife delivered a baby on 23.12.2017, however, the husband didn’t bother and showed no concern to meet the wife and the baby at the hospital.

It is further alleged that the petitioners put a condition and stated that they’ll take the wife back to the matrimonial home only if she agrees to brings dowry with her.

It is further alleged that, on 20.11.2019, she lodged a complaint to the Mudalgi Police Station, and thereafter the petitioners were summoned by the police and the petitioners gave in writing stating that they would take back the wife to the matrimonial home.

The police registered the case against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section 498A read with Section 34 of IPC. The chargesheet was filed against the petitioners for the aforesaid offences after the investigation was conducted by the police.

The Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet took cognizance of the aforesaid offences against the petitioners. This petition is filed taking all the exceptions.

_________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________


Arguments – 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022

Advocate of the petitioners has submitted that except general and omnibus allegations made against the petitioners, there are no specific allegations against the petitioners so as to constitute the commission of the offences alleged against the petitioners.

He further submitted that the FIR was lodged after 6 months from the date of the first petitioner refusing to take her back to the matrimonial home.

On the other hand, the advocate for the Government appearing for the State submitted that the contents of chargesheet clearly disclose the commission of the offences alleged against the petitioners and the same does not warrant any interference.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 10.03.2022 - Karnataka High court - Vague allegations made against the grandfather, mother-in-law, father-in-law and sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 11.03.2022 - Madhya Pradesh High court - Falsely implicated Omnibus allegations against entire family of the husband. FIR Quashed.


________________________________________________________________________


Court Opinion - 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022

After going through the chargesheet and complaint it is clear that though some allegations are made in the complaint against the husband, no specific allegations are made against the other petitioners subjecting her to cruelty and also demanded dowry except general and omnibus allegations.

The chargesheet does not disclose that the other petitioners have subjected the wife to cruelty and also made a demand to bring dowry.

In the absence of any material fact so as to constitute the commission of offences alleged against the petitioners, the filing of the chargesheet against them is not sustainable in law. The various contentions of the husband that there are no materials for having committed the aforesaid offences is a matter which requires consideration by the trial Court after a full-fledged trial.

At this stage the husband has not made any prima facie case to quash the impugned proceedings pending against him. In view of the foregoing discussions, this court proceed to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

________________________________________________________________________

Contact For Counseling to discuss Your case For Right Solutions_______________________________________________________________________

Conclusion - 498A quash after chargesheet 17.03.2022

In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that general and omnibus allegations are made against the petitioners. The allegations made against the petitioners were made just to make them suffer through the criminal proceedings. Majorly the allegations were made against the husband.

In view of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, in the absence of any specific allegations made against the petitioners, the Karnataka High court has quashed the petition against all the petitioners.



Follow us On Facebook, Youtube, Twitter , Instagram

Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Rights

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment