Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Vague statements made against the married sister-in-law, her husband, her father-in-law and her relatives. FIR Quashed.

498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Vague statements made against the married sister-in-law and her husband, her father-in-law, and her other relatives. FIR Quashed.

498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022 – Karnataka High Court – Vague statements made against the married sister-in-law and her husband, her father-in-law and her other relatives. FIR Quashed.
498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022

GET THIS DOC IN PDF WITH CASE DETAILS


Read More Judgements on 498a Quash

Smt.Mona vs The Station House Officer on 28.03.2022

498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022 – In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the petitioners are just vague statements in nature. As the allegations made against the petitioners are made without quoting any specific incident which would attract the provisions of section 498A IPC. As it is clear that the married sister-in-law, her husband, and her father-in-law and other relatives were residing in a separate place different from the place of the wife. Therefore, the Karnataka High Court has quashed the petition against all the petitioners.


Case Brief –
498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022

The marriage of the wife was solemnized with the husband on 25.10.2017 as per the rites and customs of their religion. In the initial year of the marriage everything was going on smoothly between the husband and the wife.

Soon after the very first year of the marriage, the relationship between the wife and the husband started getting strained, resulting a complaint was registered by the wife on 29.09.2018 for the aforesaid offences.

A chargesheet was filed by the police against the petitioners after the investigation has been completed by the police. On the filing of the final chargesheet, the petitioners filed an application under Section 239 Cr.P.C., seeking their discharge from the aforesaid offences.

That having been rejected, are before this Court calling in question the entire proceedings as well as the order passed by the learned Magistrate under Section 239 Cr.P.C.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A quash judgement 28.03.2022 - Karnataka High court - General and Omnibus allegations made against the relatives of the husband. FIR Quashed.

BUY "498A QUASH" - EBOOK - A GUIDE TO 498A QUASH

__________________________________________________________________________

Arguments – 498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022


The advocate for the petitioner submitted that there are no allegations against the petitioners of involvement in any overt act by them that would attract the provisions of offences punishable under Section 498A IPC or even Sections 323, 506, and 504 of IPC.

As per the advocate of the petitioner the entire allegations are against the husband and even against the father-in-law and mother-in-law. He further submitted that the petitioners being in no way connected to the family of wife in the present matter, dragging them into these criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Additionally, he submitted that few of the petitioners are distant relatives, who do not even reside with the wife.

On the other hand, the opposition advocate submitted that it is a matter of trial for the petitioners to come out clean and there are allegations that would touch upon the offences punishable under Section 498A IPC.

Referred cases – 498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022

1. Geeta Mehrotra and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh

2. Rajesh Sharma and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh

3. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

4. Preeti Gupta & Anr. V. State of Jharkhand

5. G.V. Rao v. L.H.V

6. K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana

________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

Court Opinion - 498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022

After reading the chargesheet and the complaint, it is clear that there are no allegations against the petitioners that would touch upon any of the offences either of Section 498A, 323, 504 or 506 IPC.

Allowing trial on such omnibus and vague statements in the complaint and in the chargesheet, would fall foul of the judgment of the Hon’ble Court in the case of Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others v State of Bihar and Others.

The Apex Court in the case in hand has delineated and deprecated the stand of the wife in dragging almost every member of the family into the criminal proceedings, notwithstanding the fact that the allegations made were no allegations against any of the petitioners.

Making omnibus allegations or vague statements of all of them that together they have indulged in verbal abuse, would not suffice for the ingredients of Section 498A IPC, is what the Apex Court has resulted in the aforesaid judgment.

If the facts at the case in hand, against the petitioners are considered at par, allowing further proceedings would fall foul of the findings rendered by the Apex Court and become an abuse of the process of law.

_______________________________________________________

_________________________________________

Conclusion - 498A quash after chargesheet 28.03.2022

In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the omnibus and vague allegations are made against the petitioners i.e.; sister-in-law and her husband, her father-in-law and her other relatives without quoting any specific allegations against any of them. The allegations made against them were made just to make them suffer through the criminal proceedings.

In view of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, in the absence of any specific allegations made against the petitioners, the Karnataka High court quashed the petition against the petitioners.


Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Rights

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment