Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

Home 498aJudgments 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021 – Bombay High court – General allegations made against the husband, Father-in-law, Mother-in-law & married sisters-in-law are absurd in nature. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021 – Bombay High court – General allegations made against the husband, Father-in-law, Mother-in-law & married sisters-in-law are absurd in nature. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021 – Bombay High court – General allegations made against the husband, Father-in-law, Mother-in-law & married sisters-in-law are absurd in nature. FIR Quashed.
498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021 – Bombay High court – General allegations made against the husband, Father-in-law, Mother-in-law & married sisters-in-law are absurd in nature. FIR Quashed.
 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

Read More Judgements on 498a Quash

Rahul Madhav Phate And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21.12.2021

498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021 – In this article, the Bombay High court has held that the allegations made against the petitioners are absurd in nature as the mere mention of the names of the petitioners is not a sufficient cause to attract the provisions of Sections 498 A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the proceedings arising therefrom. Further, it was held by the Bombay High court that even if the allegations against the petitioners are taken at their face value even then no case is made out against them. Therefore, the FIR & the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners is liable to be quashed.


Case Brief - 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

The marriage of the husband and wife got solemnized according to their wish and in accordance with their rituals. Everything was running smoothly until the parents of the husband started to demand a certain amount of dowry.

The wife also stated that she was subjected to ill-treatment on account of the non-fulfilment of the dowry amount. It is stated by the wife in the complaint that she is residing at her parents’ home. Majorly the allegations in the complaint are made against the husband.

Arguments - 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

Advocate of the petitioners submitted that although the names of the petitioners are mentioned in the FIR, the allegations made against them are general in nature without attributing any particular role against any of them or without quoting any specific incident.

He further submitted that the married sisters-in-law are residing along with their husbands in their respective matrimonial homes & never had a chance to reside with the husband & the wife. Therefore, he submits that it is a clear case of over-implication.

Advocate of the wife in his counter submitted that the names of the petitioners are mentioned in the FIR with specific roles attributed to each of them. He also stated that the wife was subjected to ill-treatment on account of the non-fulfilment of the dowry demand. Therefore, there is no substance in this criminal application and the same is liable to be dismissed.


Referred cases - 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

1. Geeta Mehrotra and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh

2. Neelu Chopra and others v. Bharti

3. Taramani Parakh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

_________________________________________

_________________________________________


Court opinion - 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

In this article, the court says that the allegations made against the petitioners are not sufficient to attract the provisions of Section 498A IPC. By reading the complaint it is understandable that just mentioning the names of the petitioners in the FIR doesn’t make them accountable for the offence committed under section 498A IPC.

No specific incident is mentioned against any of the petitioners to make them liable for punishment. It is also clear that allegations are mainly made against the husband.

Therefore, the court is of the opinion that if the allegations are absurd in nature and if no case is made out, the proceedings are liable to be quashed. Hence, the High court passed the order for quashing the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioners.

_______________________________________________________


_______________________________________________________

Conclusion - 498A Quash Judgement 21.12.2021

In this article, the Bombay High court has held that the allegations made against the petitioners are absurd in nature. The wife has merely dragged the names of the petitioners just to make them suffer through the criminal proceedings.

Hence, it is clearly a case of over-implication as it is well settled that if the allegations are absurd in nature and if no case is made out, the proceedings are liable to be quashed. In this case, even if the allegations against the petitioners are held to be proved, no case is made out.


Follow us On Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Instagram

Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Rights

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment