Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash Judgement 22.07.2021- No prima facie allegations found against In-laws living separately. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash Judgement 22.07.2021- No prima facie allegations found against In-laws living separately. FIR Quashed. 

498A Quash Judgement 22.07.2021
498A Quash Judgement 22.07.2021


498A Quash Judgment 22.07.2021- No specific allegations against the relatives of the husband to attract the alleged offenses against them. It is also admitted that the relatives are residing separately. The complaint allegations prima facie do not make out a case against distant relatives for the alleged offenses. FIR Quashed.


Brief facts 498A quash judgment 22.07.2021

The complainant had approached the Police Station and lodged a complaint contending that her marriage with her husband was solemnized on 12.05.2014 and at the time of marriage, as per the demand of the In-laws, her parents have given so many valuable articles like cash, gold, and silver ornaments to her In-laws and also the marriage expenses were met by them. 

After sometime, her husband started demanding dowry. She stays in a rental home alone with her husband where he consumes alcohol and used to abuse and assault her.

He also threatens her with dire consequences to her life and tried black magic on the complainant with an intention to cause mental and physical torture to her. 

She complaint her-in laws about this ill-treatment and stated that they also supported him.

She also said that her husband failed to maintain her and her child and also did not provide the basic amenities which are the basic requirements of a decent life. 

He tortured her physically, mentally, and also sexually. He has taken her minor son away from her without her permission.

Her husband tried to kill her by throttling her neck somehow, she escaped from his clutches and reached her relative house and there afterward called her parents and register the F.I.R in the police station. 

________________________________________________________

BUY "498A QUASH" - EBOOK - A GUIDE TO 498A QUASH

Buy "Guide to Fight Maintenance Under section

Read Related Article - Useful Tips to Handle Mediation process in 498a Quash

_______________________________________________________________________


Arguments 498A quash judgment 22.07.2021

Advocate for the petitioners submit that admittedly the husband and the complainant were residing at Chandapura, Bengaluru. 

Her father-in-law, mother-in-law, and husband reside at Harappanahalli Taluk, Davanagere while the other residents of Hassan.

An advocate of petitioners submit that her in-laws have nothing to do with the marital dispute between the husband and wife and only for the reason that they are the close relatives of her husband, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case.

Advocate submits that there are no allegations of specific nature to attract the alleged offenses against the in-laws and the allegations against the in-laws are all omnibus in nature.

Per contra, the complainant has made an allegation against all the accused persons and an investigation is under progress. 

Since the case is registered for cognizable offenses, exercising the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is unjustified and prays to dismiss the petition.



Courts Opinion 498A quash judgment 22.07.2021

From the complaint, it is very clear that immediately after the marriage her husband and the complainant was residing separately in a rented house at Chandapura, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore.

Further, the perusal of the FIR would go to show that admittedly her husband and father-in-law herein are the residents of Harappanahalli Taluk, Davanagere while other in-laws are the residents of Hassan District.

It is seen that there are no specific overt acts alleged by the complainant as against any of the in-laws herein. 

The allegations against her in-laws are all omnibus in nature and the only specific allegation made in the complaint is against the husband.

In the absence of specific allegations against in-laws and also if there are necessary materials to show that the said in-laws are residing separately, the initiation of criminal proceedings against them just for the reason that they are the near relatives of the husband are not good in law. 

The aforesaid judgments squarely apply to the facts of the case on hand.

The complaint averments prima facie do not take place in the case against the in-laws for the alleged offenses.

 Referred 498A quash judgments 22.07.2021

1. Tabrez Khan alias Guddu & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

2. Seenivasan v. The State by Inspector of Police. 

Conclusion 498A quash judgments 22.07.2021

This Article on 498A quash judgment 22.07.2021 is on the decision regarding the quashing of FIR under section 498A

The court quashes the FIR against the in-laws because prima facie do not make out a case against the petitioners for the alleged offenses.

The High court held that it is clearly seen that her in-laws reside at another place and there is no such evidence against her in-laws. 

Hence the court quashes the entire proceedings against the In-laws. FIR Quashed.

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment