Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash Judgment 10.08.2018-Vague Allegations-FIR Quashed

498A, How to Quash 498a, 498a Quashing, 498a Quash Judgments
498A, How to Quash 498a, 498a Quashing, 498a Quash Judgments

498A Quash Judgment 10.08.2018-Vague Allegations-FIR Quashed

498A Quash Judgment 10.08.2018-Vague and General Allegations of ill-treatment, demand of money, and a threat to wife made against Brothers-In-Law with no Specific Incidents living separately will not prima facie attract 498a IPC. FIR Quashed.

READ MORE 498a quash judgements by supremecourt

This article is based on the 498A Quash Judgment 10.08.2018-Vague Allegations-FIR Quashed against the petition filed under the provisions of section 482 of the Cr.P.C for relief of quashing of FIR registered with Tofkhana police station, Ahmednagar, for the offenses under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the IPC. Lawyer for petitioners on instructions withdraws the application for parents-in-law. As a result, the FIR quashed against Brothers-in-law & their wife.

READ RELATED ARTICLE ON 22 Landmark 498a Quash Judgments by Supreme Court & Various High Courts Quashing of 498A F.I.R./Cases. 

The wife lodged a complaint against the petitioners alleging that she performed marriage with her husband on 27.02.2016. In the marriage, her father spent Rs. 25 lakh and gave 30 tolas gold. The wife went for cohabitation and just from the third day of the cohabitation, the family members were started ill-treating her mentally by saying that her father did not give a bullet in the marriage. 

On 04.03.2016 the husband told her that since the last 2 to 3 years he has a love affair with one female and if she is ready to accept the relationship, he will cohabit with the wife. The wife ignored the fact and cohabited with her husband. On 28.03.2016 parents-in-law & one brother-in-law and husband of wife abused and assaulted the wife on account of demand of Rs. 1,50,000/- for purchasing bullet and drove her out. Due to which the father of wife gave Rs. 1,50,000/- to the husband but thereafter also they ill-treated her.

READ RELATED ARTICLE ON

7 Latest 498a Judgments where Courts Quash of 498a in 2020


It is further alleged by the wife that by using her husband's phone female threatened the wife. When the wife told about the said fact to her father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law they assaulted her and also threatened to kill. 

On 30.10.2016 at the time of Laxmipujan the Parents-in-law, BIL and her husband demanded Rs. 5 lakh for purchasing a flat. On that count, they have beaten her and expelled her to the house of her maternal uncle. With these allegations, the offence came to be registered against the petitioners/accused of the offenses punishable under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the IPC.  
The High Court heard the arguments for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and, Lawyer for the wife. 

On perusal of the FIR, it appeared that specific allegations of demand of money and harassment are made against parents-in-law and husband. The allegations made against both BIL & Wife of BIL are vague and general in nature. 

It appeared that one of the BIL was in service and residing at Ghatkopar (West) Mumbai. The other BIL along with his wife is also residing at Titwala, Tq. Kalyan. Therefore prima- facie it appears that both BIL & wife of BIL have no direct concern with alleged ill-treatment, the demand for money, and a threat to wife.

Check More 498a quashquashing of 498a of the supreme court on 498a


The High Court held that on perusal of the FIR it also appeared that there was no material particular quoting any specific incident of the visit or about ill-treatment or harassment at the hands of both BIL & wife of BIL, so as to attract the ingredients of Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code or other offense as alleged by the wife. 

Hence to prevent the abuse of the process of law, the High Court finds that discretion needs to be exercised in respect of Both BIL & wife of BIL. Hence, quashed the FIR against Both Brothers-in-law & Wife of BIL who are living separately and have no concern with the family and granted relief to them.

Conclusion: This Article 498A Quash Judgment 10.08.2018-Vague Allegations-FIR Quashed.

It will help the husbands who have FIR against their parents, Brothers-in-law, and their wives. Those are living away from the complainant and have no interference in their life. 

 Follow on  Facebook , Twitter , YouTube , Instagram
WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment