Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – General & Omnibus allegations against parents-in-law, sister-in-law and her husband. FIR Quashed.

 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – General & Omnibus allegations against parents-in-law, sister-in-law and her husband. FIR Quashed.

498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022 - Karnataka High Court – General & Omnibus allegations against parents-in-law, sister-in-law and her husband. FIR Quashed.
 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

GET THIS DOC IN PDF WITH CASE DETAILS


Yashwanth Bhaskar vs State By Basavanagudi P.S on 14.06.2022

498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022 – In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the petitioners i.e.; parents-in-law, sister-in-law, and her husband are general and omnibus in nature. The Karnataka High Court further held that majorly the allegations were raised against the husband as it is clear by reading the statement made in the chargesheet.

 

Case brief - 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

The marriage between the wife and the husband was solemnized on 15.06.2014 as per the rites and ceremonies of their religion. In the beginning of the marriage, everything was running smooth between the couple.

After the marriage, the wife went to the United States of America on 24.06.2014 along with her husband. During the stay of the couple the wife was subjected to cruelty both mentally and physically at the instigation of the other petitioners. And also the wife was assaulted by her husband.

It is further stated that the husband at the instance of other family members demanded to bring a certain sum of money from her parental home.

It is also stated that the wife returned to India on 20.11.2017 and thereafter started to reside at her parent’s home along with her parents. It is stated that on 23.07.2019 the wife went for a hearing of the case filed by her husband and when the wife tried to talk to her husband at that point in time her father-in-law and brother-in-law objected and threatened to give a complaint to the Police.

The Magistrate, therefore, accepted the chargesheet for the offence punishable under Section 498A read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and issued summons to the petitioners. Considering the exception to the same, this petition has been filed.

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash after chargesheet 13.06.2022 -  Madhya Pradesh High court - Omnibus allegations made against the mother-in-law to flasely implicate her. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash after chargesheet 06.06.2022 -  Karnataka High court - General and Omnibus allegations made against the brother-in-law, his wife & sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

BUY "498A QUASH" - EBOOK - A GUIDE TO 498A QUASH

__________________________________________________________________________ 


Arguments - 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

The advocate appearing for the petitioners submitted that except for omnibus and general allegations, there is no specific allegation made against the petitioners for having committed the aforesaid offences.

In the absence of any corroborative material, the filing of the chargesheet only on the basis of omnibus and general allegations is not permissible.

He further submitted that FIR was lodged as a counterblast to the petition filed for dissolving the marriage on the ground of cruelty.

On the other hand, the advocate for the wife submitted that the chargesheet clearly discloses the commission of the offence alleged against the petitioners.

And the advocate further submitted that there is a specific allegation of cruelty made out by the husband at the instance of other petitioners and the same does not interfere and sought for dismissal of the petition.

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Referred cases - 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

1. State of Andhra Pradesh v. Madhusudan

2. Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and Others v State of Bihar and Others

________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

Court opinion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

By reading the FIR lodged by the wife which clearly indicates that the marriage was solemnized with the husband on 15.06.2014 and on 24.06.2014 she left for the USA along with her husband and continued her marital life with the husband in the USA till she returned to India on 20.11.2017.

During her stay in the USA, the wife was subjected to cruelty by her husband at the instance of other petitioners and also there was a demand to bring money from her parental home. Before lodging of  the present FIR, the husband had filed a petition for dissolving the marriage with the wife on the ground of cruelty.

The said petition was filed on 06.08.2018. The FIR was lodged on 02.08.2019 after nearly 2 years of her arrival from the USA without offering any reasonable explanation.

FIR was lodged without offering any reasonable explanation as an afterthought so as to circumvent the proceeding initiated by the husband to dissolve his marriage with the wife on the ground of cruelty.

Hence, the FIR lodged by the wife without offering any plausible explanation is malice and without probable cause.

Except for omnibus and general allegations, there are no specific allegations against the petitioners as to how and in what manner the wife was subjected to cruelty by the petitioners. Hence, the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the petitioners would amount to an abuse of the process of law, and the FIR was lodged so as to falsely implicate and wreak vengeance.

________________________________________

_________________________________________ 

Conclusion - 498A Quash after chargesheet 14.06.2022

In this article, the Karnataka High Court has held that the allegations made against the petitioners were general and omnibus in nature. The allegation raised were made without quoting any specific avert act against any of the petitioners. As it is clear from reading the FIR and the chargesheet that majorly the allegations were raised against the husband.

Hence, the Karnataka High Court feels it right to Quash the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners.


Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Right 

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment