Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

The allegations of the complaint u/s 498a, 406 IPC need to be scrutinized with great care against the Husband, His Parents and close relatives. How to Quash 498a F.I.R




How to Quash 498a F.I.R.



How to Quash 498a F.I.R.

How to Quash 498a F.I.R. Punjab-Haryana High Court, A petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking quashing of FIR under Sections 323406 498a420506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the ground that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. the petitioner No. 1 is the mother-in-law of the complainant aged about 67 years and petitioner No. 2 is the married sister- in-law. A complaint had initially been filed by the complainant before the Superintendent of Police which had duly been investigated into and after investigation, an opinion had been formed that no offence is made out against petitioner No. 1 herein. It is only thereafter that the FIR in question came to be registered.  

The allegations regarding demand of dowry have been raised primarily against the husband while stating that he had solemnized another marriage in Canada. The allegations are general in nature qua the petitioners and are not sustainable. There is no specific allegation or details made out in the FIR to satisfy the ingredients of Sections 406 and 498-A of the IPC against the petitioners. Moreover, petitioner No. 2 is the married sister-in- law and again no specific allegations have been made against her. The Hon’ble high court relied on The Apex Court the judgment rendered in Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand, AIR 2010 SC 3363 that The tendency of implicating husband and all his immediate relations is also not uncommon. 

“At times, even after the conclusion of criminal trial, it is difficult to 4 of 5 ascertain the real truth. The courts have to be extremely careful and cautious in dealing with these complaints and must take pragmatic realities into consideration while dealing with matrimonial cases. The allegations of harassment of husband's close relations who had been living in different cities and never visited or rarely visited the place where the complainant resided would have an entirely different complexion. The allegations of the complaint are required to be scrutinized with great care and circumspection. "

The Hon’ble High court observed that one cannot lose sight of the fact that the petitioner herein has paid some amount to the complainant as full and final settlement as evident from the "Divorce Deed". It is also brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner No. 1 is looking after the minor child born out of the wedlock between the complainant and her son. In view of all facts , the petition was allowed and FIR, under Sections 323406498-A

You can contact me for legal consultation or advice by 

discussing with me Contact now
WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment