Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

Home 498aJudgments 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022 - Allahabad High Court – General allegations against husband and In-laws. Summons Quashed.

498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022 - Allahabad High Court – General allegations against husband and In-laws. Summons Quashed.

 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022 - Allahabad High Court – General allegations against husband and In-laws. Summons Quashed.

Ravish Mall And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25.07.2022

498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022 – In this article, the Allahabad High Court has held that falsely implicated allegations made against the five petitioners were general in nature. It is clear that the impugned summoned order passed by the Court below is cryptic and does not stand the test laid down by this Court. Accordingly, the present criminal application succeeds and is allowed. The impugned summoning order dated 17.02.2020 passed by Magistrate, is set aside. The Magistrate shall pass a fresh order in the light of the observations made herein above.

 

Case brief - 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022

The application under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed challenging the summoned order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Delhi Police Act, District as well as the entire proceedings of the mentioned complaint case.

 

_________________________________________________________________________

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash Judgement 20.07.2022 - Madras High court - Bald and Vague allegations made against the husband and his family members. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash Judgement 19.07.2022 - Calcutta High court - Baseless allegations made against the husband and his relatives. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A Quash after Chargesheet 08.07.2022 - Calcutta High court - Vague and Omnibus allegations made against the husband and the mother-in-law. FIR Quashed.

Read Latest Article- 498A quash after chargesheet 29.06.2022 - Karnataka High court - Omnibus statements made against parents-in-law & sister-in-law. FIR Quashed.

__________________________________________________________________________

Arguments - 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022

Advocate for the petitioners invited the attention of the Court to the summoned order dated 17.02.2020. The advocate submitted that the impugned order in the present application is wholly arbitrary and therefore liable to be set aside by this Court.

He further elaborated his submission and submitted that the court below has simply recorded a conclusion that on the basis of the complaint, the statement of the wife and his witnesses, prima facie an offence under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 Delhi Police Act appears to have been committed.

 _______________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________

Referred cases - 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022

1. Mahboob and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

2. Shiv Kumar and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

3. Hariram Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

4. M/s. Pepsi Food Ltd. & another vs. Special Judicial Magistrate

5. Paul George vs. State

6. S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla

7. Anita Malhotra v. Apparel Export Promotion Council

 ________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________  

Court opinion - 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022

In the present case, the Magistrate has not conducted any inquiry so as to satisfy himself that the allegations in the complaint constitute an offence when considered along with the statements recorded.

There are few grounds for initiating proceedings against the petitioners under Section 204 CrPC. There is nothing on record to show that the Magistrate has applied his mind to arrive at a prima facie conclusion. 

It must be recalled that summoning of accused to appear in the criminal court is a serious matter affecting the dignity self-respect and image in society. A criminal court process cannot be made a weapon of harassment. 

The magistrate has passed a very cryptic order simply by saying that the statement of wife, as well as witnesses recorded under Sections 200 and 202 CrPC, are perused and petitioners are summoned such order though this order itself is illegal which could not stand the test of law.

Considering the averment of a present petition under section 482 CrPC as, the incorrect and unbelievable complaint case, false implication of five petitioners, and the general allegations leveled by the informant in her FIR without allegations of any specific act, the incorrectness of cause of action for the complaint and considering the vagueness of information mentioned in the complaint, and considering the verdict mentioned in above rulings of Hon'ble Apex Court, this seems to be a case in which petitioners should succeed and the impugned summoned order, as well as the complaint case, should be quashed.

 _____________________________________________________

Buy "Guide to Fight Maintenance Under section 125 Cr.P.C

_________________________________________________________________________________ 

Conclusion - 498A Summons Quashing 25.07.2022

In this article, the Allahabad High Court has held that the false implicated allegations made against the five petitioners were general in nature. Considering the judgements referred above, it is clear that the impugned summoning order passed by the Court below is cryptic and does not stand the test laid down by this Court.

Accordingly, the present criminal application succeeds and is allowed. The impugned summoning order dated 17.02.2020 passed by Magistrate, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 Delhi Police Act, is set aside. The Magistrate shall pass a fresh order in the light of the observations made herein above.


Join Facebook Group - Apaizers Mens Right 

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment