Client Testimonials

"By far the best legal document drafting expert! I’ve been struggling with a false 498/406 and DV case from last 2 years and so far met 20+ Different lawyers from lower court to high court, but the major difference I see in Sahil is his intentions of making me out of this situation so that I can be a free man. Only a 30 min discussion with Sahil was an eye opener to me. Now I'm feeling more confident that such cases can also be defended and law can be moved from women-centric to men-centric. I have asked Sahil for a ‘bayan’ for my DV case which he, after analyzing 50+ documents, has made it in a lightning speed time of 24 hours. I would also say I was surprised that he didn’t forget to mention even a single nook of any statement that could be in my favor. I would highly recommend anyone for a free 30 min call that can give a new hopeful direction; without losing anything."

"Sahil is one of the best brains to help someone to fight these kinds of cases. His grasping power is awesome to understand your case quickly and provide a solution. Sahil knows very well which point he has to highlight in the draft so people like us get the clarity on our own case and get the best result in the court. His knowledge is admirable as he has a good grip on different IPCs and Cr.P.C from our law system. I worked with him on my 498a petition and feeling quite confident after working with him. I will recommend everyone to talk to Sahil once to get the best result from your case. Now he is my good friend too. Thanks Sahil."

"I got in connect with Sahil sir few months back to seek his guidance for 125 CrPC, DV, and 498A. I must say it's really helpful and Sahil sir had drafted a strong WS for me. It was under the sheer guidance of Sahil sir that I could tackle my mediation in a positive manner."

"I am very thankful to Apaizers Mens Rights in supporting and helping me in my case and saved my lakhs of rupees. Sir also motivates time to time, also advises how to maintain your health first which is NECESSARY in this critical condition. It's clear that no more people from our side help or motivate during this time of false cases. In this time, we require a good or best adviser. Really, Sir IS ALL IN ONE. I repeat that unnumbered thanks to Apaizers Men's Right for the best advice to false cases."

"I got my DV interim maintenance appeal prepared from Apaizers Mens Rights for the session court. It is so nicely drafted and prepared with relevant case reference due to which the session court dismissed the interim maintenance order passed by the lower court. Then in my DV case, the opposite party filed for execution petition for the arrears of the maintenance amount 1.2 lakhs, the objections drafted by Sahil Sir with the relevant facts and case reference got accepted by the court and the court dismissed the OP execution petition."

DV Act Case Dismissed - Maintenance Denied

Judicial Magistrate 1st Class - While Dismissing The Complaint by Wife under the Domestic Violence Act - Said Complaint is based upon False and Frivolous allegations.


On a complaint of wife under domestic Violence u/s 23 and under section 12 sort relief for a huge amount of interim maintenance and final maintenance and right to residence in a shared household. The husband came in contact with Apaizers Mens Right. A planned strategy was suggested to the husband regarding the pursuance of the case u/s of the domestic violence act. The same is being adhered by the husband and on his demand Reply to the Interim Application and Main Application prepared by Apaizers Mens Right keeping in mind all the allegations and actual facts and supreme courts ruling references.

On the hearing of Interim Maintenance Application, the court dismissed the arguments related to the shared household and no relief is given to the wife under this provision and a very nominal amount of Rs. 3000/- p.m. interim maintenance was passed. 

Further to the main application, the cross-examination was done on both sides and the court finally dismisses the application by giving below mentioned order:

" It is pertinent to mention here that there is no domestic incidence report in the instant case against the respondents. Moreover, the complainant has failed to specifically plead the reliefs which are being claimed by her by way of the instant complaint.

As no act of domestic Violence act has been proved, there is no question of grant of any relief to the complainant. In view of the discussion above, this court finds that the allegation leveled by the complainant are baseless such, the complainant is not an 'aggrieved person' as defined in the Act and cannot be said to be entitled to any of the reliefs under the Act.

In view of the fact that the basic ingredients of the Act that complainant is an aggrieved person have not been proved in the instant case, this court is of the considered view that said the complaint is based on false and frivolous allegations. Accordingly, the present complaint stands dismissed."

You can contact me for legal consultation or advice by 
discussing with me Contact now

WhatsApp




    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment